The Influence of Mainstream Educational Culture and Dominant Aesthetic Values on the Inclusion of Diverse and Individual Aesthetics in Chinese Art Education

Authors

  • Yiming Xie University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/qep2mb59

Keywords:

Chinese art education; Gaokao; multicultural education; curriculum reform; cultural diversity.

Abstract

This article discusses how mainstream educational culture and dominant aesthetic values affect the integration of multicultural perspectives and individual aesthetic expression in Chinese art education. Taking the college entrance examination art examination as an example, this article compares Taylor's theoretical foundation and Banks' multicultural curriculum framework to explore the different paths between the two in terms of curriculum design, educational equity and cultural diversity. The analysis points out that although Taylor's model maintains national uniformity through standardized curricula and assessments, it also limits the creativity of students, teachers' autonomy, and the presentation of ethnic minority culture. In contrast, Banks' framework advocates multicultural integration, culturally responsive teaching, and wider participation of students in curriculum development, but its implementation under China's centralized and test-based education system faces many challenges. This article further explores the relevance of these frameworks to the integration of creativity, art education and intangible cultural heritage into school curricula. The article suggests that future curriculum reform should seek a balance between standardization and inclusiveness, respecting multicultural traditions and ensuring the quality of education. This study helps to explore curriculum reform, multicultural education and cultural sustainability in contemporary Chinese art education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Banks, J. A. (1993). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. Review of Research in Education, 19, 3–49. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X019001003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X019001003

[2] Brennan, M. (2022). Teachers and students as researchers: Rebuilding curriculum inquiry for the future. Curriculum Perspectives, 42, 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-022-00156-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-022-00159-7

[3] Du, S. (2024). In defense of the Tyler rationale: As a model for curriculum development. The Educational Review USA, 8, 837–841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26855/er.2024.06.009

[4] Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.

[5] Hlebowitsh, P. (2021). Ralph Tyler, the Tyler rationale, and the idea of educational evaluation. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore.9780190264093.013.1028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1036

[6] Hersh, R. H., & Cohen, S. J. (1971). A case against a case against behavioral objectives. The Elementary School Journal, 71, 430–437. https://doi.org/10.1086/460543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/460665

[7] May, S. (2010). Critical multiculturalism (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203858059

[8] Mockler, N., & Stacey, M. (2024). Outsourced curriculum planning to reduce teacher workload: Tracing the evolution of a policy solution. Curriculum Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-024-00189-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-024-00280-9

[9] Pinar, W. F. (2014). Curriculum studies in China. In Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks (pp. 223–246). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137337234_13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137374295_13

[10] Ren, R. (2022). Educational success in transitional China: The Gaokao and learning capital in elite professional service firms. The China Quarterly, 252, 1277–1298. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741022001346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741022000856

[11] Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. In D. J. Flinders & S. J. Thornton (Eds.), Curriculum studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 60–68). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203017609-14

[12] United Nations. (2025). The 17 sustainable development goals. United Nations.

Downloads

Published

27-08-2026

How to Cite

Xie, Y. (2026). The Influence of Mainstream Educational Culture and Dominant Aesthetic Values on the Inclusion of Diverse and Individual Aesthetics in Chinese Art Education. Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 17, 307-311. https://doi.org/10.62051/qep2mb59