Theoretical Research on the Influence of Consumer Protection Policies on Brand Trust in Social Media Marketing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ea3gzd86Keywords:
Social media marketing; Consumer protection policy; Brand trust; Perceived risk; Signal Theory.Abstract
As social media becomes an important marketing channel for businesses, consumers are facing problems such as information asymmetry, privacy leaks and false advertising while enjoying convenience, and whether consumer protection policies are sound or not directly affects consumers' trust in brands. Based on trust theory, signal theory and social exchange theory, this paper studies the mechanism of the impact of consumer protection policies on brand trust in the social media marketing environment. First, analyze the characteristics of social media marketing and the issue of consumer protection, and discuss the contents of consumer protection policies in aspects such as data privacy protection, advertising authenticity regulation, and after-sales service guarantee. Next, a theoretical model of "consumer protection policy - perceived safety - brand trust" is proposed to analyze how policy transparency, enforcement, and relief measures affect consumer cognitive trust, emotional trust, and behavioral trust by reducing perceived risk, enhancing perceived fairness, and increasing platform credibility. Then analyze the moderating effects of consumer personal factors, brand types, and platform nature on the impact of consumer protection policies on the degree of consumer trust, thereby demonstrating that the impact of consumer protection policies on consumer trust varies in different circumstances. Finally, this paper offers suggestions from the perspectives of improving legal systems, clarifying platform responsibilities, and forming multi-party cooperative governance, in order for enterprises to comply with consumer protection regulations in the process of social media marketing to enhance brand trust, and also provides references for relevant government departments to formulate and improve relevant policies, which has certain theoretical and practical significance.
Downloads
References
[1] Liu, D. (2025). The balancing acts: Communicating legitimacy in global speech governance. Social Media + Society, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251347621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251340855
[2] Mosteller, J., & Poddar, A. (2017). To share and protect: Using regulatory focus theory to examine the privacy paradox of consumers' social media engagement and online privacy protection behaviors. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 39, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.02.003
[3] Sun, L. (2026). Research on consumer rights protection in online live-streaming sales. Modern Business, (10), 23–26. (In Chinese)
[4] Yang, Y. S., Gu, X. Y., & Yang, X. S. From "rational person" to "contextual person": A new exploration of the mechanism by which privacy concerns affect users' willingness to participate in short video information flow advertising: A case study of Douyin App. New Media & Society. (In Chinese)
[5] Hong, J. W., & Chang, J. Y. (2025). Transparency is trust? The paradox of user perception and trust in the practice of platform algorithm transparency. News and Writing, (9), 31–45. (In Chinese)
[6] Feng, J. R. (2024). Advertising law regulation of influencer marketing on social media platforms: Centered on identifiability. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), 24(2), 137–144. (In Chinese)
[7] Liu, X. C. (2025). Regulatory governance shift in the construction of platform trust mechanism: A perspective on the conflict between live-streaming sales and the application of the Advertising Law. Administrative Law Research, (2), 65–79. (In Chinese)
[8] Liu, C. X., & Zhang, Y. F. (2024). Pros and cons and privacy transfer: The impact of perceived personalization on consumer trust in smart advertising. Journal of Journalism, (12), 101–116, 121. (In Chinese)
[9] Wang, X. N., & Zhong, S. M. (2024). The case of promoting pension finance with digital finance: The impact of the "dual recording" regulatory policy on the financial participation of the elderly. Insurance Research, (8), 69–83. (In Chinese)
[10] Liu, B. L., Li, J., Yi, M., & Li, Y. H. (2024). Research on the design of privacy protection methods from the perspective of the Personal Information Protection Law: Privacy notification and its impact on privacy uncertainty. Journal of Library Science of China, 50(3), 47–66. (In Chinese)
[11] Yuan, X. L., & Niu, J. (2021). An empirical study of social media privacy policy and user self-disclosure: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Information Resources Management, 11(1), 49–58. (In Chinese)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
