An Analysis of the Impact of Social Media on the Communication Ecology of Traditional News Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/5rx1x062Keywords:
Social media; Traditional news media; Communication ecology; Agenda-setting; Gatekeeping; Media convergence; News trust; Audience fragmentation.Abstract
The rapid rise of social media has dramatically altered the communications environment in which traditional news companies operate, affecting well-established ways of news generation, dissemination and audience participation. This research analyses the multidimensional effects of social media on traditional news media from three theoretical perspectives: media ecology theory, agenda-setting theory and gatekeeping theory. Drawing on empirical data from global audience studies, platform data and new communication literature, the paper discusses how social media has disturbed the attention economy, deteriorated traditional gatekeeping authority and re-aligned intermedia agenda-setting dynamics. It also reflects on the ramifications for news credibility and audience trust and examines the convergence methods with which established media firms are attempting to reconfigure their role in the altered communication environment. Our analysis suggests that while social media has permanently changed the structural conditions of journalism, traditional news media still have unique institutional resources – editorial authority, source credibility and investigative capacity – that make them important nodes in a hybrid information environment.
Downloads
References
[1] McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315122834
[2] Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. Viking Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315128171
[3] Lievrouw, L. A., & Livingstone, S. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of new media: Social shaping and social consequences of ICTs. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446211304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446211304
[4] McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/36.2.176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
[5] Jang, S.-H., Geng, T., Li, J.-Y., Xia, R., Huang, C.-F., Kim, H., & Tang, J. (2024). Intermedia attribute agenda-setting between the U.S. mainstream newspapers and Twitter. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 101(3), 541–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241242118
[6] Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203931653
[7] Shoemaker, P. J., & Han, G. (2020). The supra-gatekeepers: Gatekeeping in the age of social media. Communication and Society, 54, 223–256. https://doi.org/10.1558/coms.39321
[8] Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C. T., Eddy, K., & Nielsen, R. K. (2024). Reuters Institute digital news report 2024. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2024
[9] Scheffauer, R., Goyanes, M., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2024). Social media algorithmic versus professional journalists' news selection: Effects of gatekeeping on traditional and social media news trust. Journalism, 25(4), 855–873. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231225661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231179804
[10] Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
[11] Saridou, C., Kalogeropoulos, A., Veglis, A., & Goutziomitros, S. (2024). Research on traditional media integration and innovation strategies in new media context. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 7(2), 1–9.
[12] Thorson, L., & Wells, C. (2016). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
