Labor Narratives and Identity Construction of Marginalized Women on Social Media Platforms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/eqd5ej08Keywords:
Social Media Platforms; Marginalized Women; Digital Labor; Identity Construction; Labor Narratives; Platform Economy.Abstract
The nature of digital labor and identity expression of rural women, single mothers, and women with disabilities are influenced by intersecting class and gender constraints on social media platforms. This paper will focus on such marginalized groups and explore the characteristics of their labor stories and the reasoning behind identity formation, and reveal how the platform economy contains structural inequities. This research utilizes in-depth interviews as well as verification of data by using the official reports and 12 field cases. It is found that despite the fact that these women build various identities based on labor narratives, they experience urgent dilemmas such as unclear limits of work, inflexible algorithmic labels, and social shame, which significantly constrain their creative and development space. These narratives have also shifted and moved beyond simple images of survival into conscious expressions of self-worth. In contrast to the support strategies of the mainstream platforms, this paper suggests a holistic strategy of platform power, community-based support, and institutional protections, to provide a practical perspective on enhancing the digital labor opportunities of marginalized women and empowering their identity affirmation.
Downloads
References
[1] Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814763401.001.0001
[2] Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018760241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
[3] Anwar, M. A. (2022). Platforms of inequality: Gender dynamics of digital labour in Africa. Gender & Development, 30(3), 747–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2022.2105223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2022.2121059
[4] van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001
[5] Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300235029.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235029
[6] Yu, H., & Cui, L. (2019). China's e-commerce: Empowering rural women? The China Quarterly, 238, 418–437. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741019000247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741018001819
[7] Vlasceanu, M., & Amodio, D. M. (2022). Propagation of societal gender inequality by internet search algorithms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(29), e2204529119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2204529119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2204529119
[8] Glatt, Z. (2022). Precarity, discrimination and (in) visibility: An ethnography of “The Algorithm” in the YouTube influencer industry. In A. Ortner (Ed.), The Routledge companion to media anthropology (pp. 544–556). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429341704-45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003175605-53
[9] Guo, J. (2022). The postfeminist entrepreneurial self and the platformisation of labour: A case study of yesheng female lifestyle bloggers on Xiaohongshu. Global Media and China, 7(3), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364221099744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364221095896
[10] Gerrard, Y., & Thornham, H. (2020). Content moderation: Social media’s sexist assemblages. New Media & Society, 22(7), 1266–1286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819888741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820912540
[11] Muñoz, I., Kim, P., O'Neil, C., Dunn, M., & Sawyer, S. (2024). Platformization of inequality: Gender and race in digital labor platforms. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3637385
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
